mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
24f816b6a3
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
60 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Physical Intrusion Assessment Report Template
|
|
|
|
## Assessment Details
|
|
|
|
| Field | Value |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Assessment ID | PHYS-YYYY-XXX |
|
|
| Client | [Organization] |
|
|
| Facility | [Address] |
|
|
| Assessment Dates | YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD |
|
|
| Assessor(s) | [Names] |
|
|
| Authorization | [RoE document reference] |
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
Physical security testing of [Facility] revealed [X] successful unauthorized entries out of [Y] attempts ([Z]% success rate). Critical findings include [summary of top findings].
|
|
|
|
## Facility Map
|
|
|
|
[Insert annotated facility map showing entry points, camera positions, and successful access paths]
|
|
|
|
## Results Summary
|
|
|
|
| Metric | Result |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Total Access Attempts | XX |
|
|
| Successful Entries | XX |
|
|
| Success Rate | XX% |
|
|
| Detection Rate | XX% |
|
|
| Challenge Rate | XX% |
|
|
| Rogue Devices Deployed | XX |
|
|
| Restricted Areas Accessed | XX |
|
|
|
|
## Findings
|
|
|
|
### Finding 1: [Title]
|
|
|
|
| Field | Value |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Severity | Critical/High/Medium/Low |
|
|
| Location | [Specific location] |
|
|
| Technique | [Method used] |
|
|
| Detected | Yes/No |
|
|
| Evidence | [Photo/video reference] |
|
|
|
|
**Description:** [What was found]
|
|
**Impact:** [Potential business impact]
|
|
**Remediation:** [Specific fix]
|
|
|
|
## Recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Immediate
|
|
1. [Critical remediation]
|
|
|
|
### Short-Term
|
|
1. [High-priority improvement]
|
|
|
|
### Long-Term
|
|
1. [Strategic enhancement]
|