saint-graves/sica-fondt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
sica-fondt/knowledge/cyber-skills/skills/performing-physical-intrusion-assessment/assets/template.md
Claude 24f816b6a3
Consolidate 22 sibling repos into layered organism structure 
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):

- brain/        LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
                dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/    LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
                MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/    defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser

License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.

Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
2026-06-10 06:53:01 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Physical Intrusion Assessment Report Template

Assessment Details

Field Value
Assessment ID PHYS-YYYY-XXX
Client [Organization]
Facility [Address]
Assessment Dates YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD
Assessor(s) [Names]
Authorization [RoE document reference]

Executive Summary

Physical security testing of [Facility] revealed [X] successful unauthorized entries out of [Y] attempts ([Z]% success rate). Critical findings include [summary of top findings].

Facility Map

[Insert annotated facility map showing entry points, camera positions, and successful access paths]

Results Summary

Metric Result
Total Access Attempts XX
Successful Entries XX
Success Rate XX%
Detection Rate XX%
Challenge Rate XX%
Rogue Devices Deployed XX
Restricted Areas Accessed XX

Findings

Finding 1: [Title]

Field Value
Severity Critical/High/Medium/Low
Location [Specific location]
Technique [Method used]
Detected Yes/No
Evidence [Photo/video reference]

Description: [What was found] Impact: [Potential business impact] Remediation: [Specific fix]

Recommendations

Immediate

  1. [Critical remediation]

Short-Term

  1. [High-priority improvement]

Long-Term

  1. [Strategic enhancement]