saint-graves/sica-fondt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git synced 2026-08-01 00:23:15 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
sica-fondt/knowledge/cyber-skills/skills/performing-indicator-lifecycle-management/assets/template.md
Claude 24f816b6a3
Consolidate 22 sibling repos into layered organism structure 
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):

- brain/        LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
                dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/    LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
                MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/    defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser

License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.

Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
2026-06-10 06:53:01 +00:00

1004 B
Raw Blame History

Indicator Lifecycle Management Report Template

Report Metadata

Field Value
Report ID CTI-YYYY-NNNN
Date YYYY-MM-DD
Classification TLP:AMBER
Analyst [Name]
Confidence High/Moderate/Low

Executive Summary

[Brief overview of key findings and their significance]

Key Findings

  1. [Finding 1 with supporting evidence]
  2. [Finding 2 with supporting evidence]
  3. [Finding 3 with supporting evidence]

Detailed Analysis

Finding 1

  • Evidence: [Description of evidence]
  • Confidence: High/Moderate/Low
  • MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]
  • Impact Assessment: [Potential impact to organization]

Indicators of Compromise

Type Value Context Confidence

Recommendations

  1. Immediate: [Actions requiring immediate attention]
  2. Short-term: [Actions within 1-2 weeks]
  3. Long-term: [Strategic improvements]

References

  • [Source 1]
  • [Source 2]