mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
41 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# API Reference: Access Review and Certification
|
|
|
|
## CSV Input Format
|
|
```csv
|
|
username,entitlement,application,manager,status,last_used,risk_score
|
|
jsmith,Admin,SAP,mjones,active,2025-01-15T00:00:00Z,8
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## SoD Rules JSON Format
|
|
```json
|
|
[{"name": "Finance SoD", "role_a": "AP_Approver", "role_b": "AP_Creator"}]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Key Review Checks
|
|
| Check | Description | Severity |
|
|
|-------|-------------|----------|
|
|
| Orphaned accounts | No manager or terminated status | HIGH |
|
|
| SoD violations | Conflicting entitlements held | CRITICAL |
|
|
| Excessive access | Entitlement count above threshold | MEDIUM |
|
|
| Stale entitlements | Unused beyond retention period | MEDIUM |
|
|
|
|
## Compliance Frameworks
|
|
| Framework | Requirement |
|
|
|-----------|-------------|
|
|
| SOX Section 404 | Periodic access reviews for financial systems |
|
|
| SOC 2 CC6.1 | Logical access controls and reviews |
|
|
| HIPAA 164.312(a) | Access authorization and review |
|
|
| PCI DSS 7.2 | Restrict access based on need-to-know |
|
|
|
|
## Review Campaign Design
|
|
| Parameter | Best Practice |
|
|
|-----------|---------------|
|
|
| Frequency | Quarterly for privileged, semi-annual for standard |
|
|
| Reviewer | Direct manager + application owner |
|
|
| Escalation | Auto-revoke if no response within 14 days |
|
|
| Evidence | Export decisions with timestamps and reviewer ID |
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
- NIST SP 800-53 AC-6: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final
|
|
- ISACA Access Review: https://www.isaca.org/
|