mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 16:40:24 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
97 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
97 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# BloodHound AD Assessment Report Template
|
|
|
|
## Document Control
|
|
|
|
| Field | Value |
|
|
|-------|-------|
|
|
| Domain | [DOMAIN.LOCAL] |
|
|
| Engagement ID | [ID] |
|
|
| Assessor | [NAME] |
|
|
| Date | [DATE] |
|
|
| Classification | CONFIDENTIAL |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
[Overview of AD security posture based on BloodHound analysis]
|
|
|
|
**Critical Findings:**
|
|
- [X] attack paths to Domain Admin identified
|
|
- [Y] Kerberoastable accounts with privileged access
|
|
- [Z] systems with unconstrained delegation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 2. Attack Path Summary
|
|
|
|
### 2.1 Shortest Path to Domain Admin
|
|
|
|
| # | Step | From | To | Edge/Method | Tool Required |
|
|
|---|------|------|----|-------------|--------------|
|
|
| 1 | | | | | |
|
|
| 2 | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
### 2.2 ACL-Based Paths
|
|
|
|
| Source | Target | Right | Abuse Method |
|
|
|--------|--------|-------|-------------|
|
|
| | | GenericAll/WriteDACL/etc. | |
|
|
|
|
### 2.3 Session-Based Paths
|
|
|
|
| Computer | Privileged Session | Path to Computer |
|
|
|----------|-------------------|-----------------|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3. Kerberoasting Targets
|
|
|
|
| Account | SPN | Admin Count | Cracked | Password |
|
|
|---------|-----|-------------|---------|----------|
|
|
| | | Yes/No | Yes/No | [REDACTED] |
|
|
|
|
## 4. AS-REP Roasting Targets
|
|
|
|
| Account | Hash Type | Cracked | Notes |
|
|
|---------|-----------|---------|-------|
|
|
| | | Yes/No | |
|
|
|
|
## 5. Delegation Issues
|
|
|
|
### Unconstrained Delegation
|
|
| Computer | OS | DC | Notes |
|
|
|----------|----|----|-------|
|
|
| | | No | |
|
|
|
|
### Constrained Delegation
|
|
| Object | Allowed To Delegate To | Abuse Potential |
|
|
|--------|------------------------|-----------------|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 6. Recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Critical (Immediate)
|
|
1. [Recommendation]
|
|
|
|
### High (30 days)
|
|
1. [Recommendation]
|
|
|
|
### Medium (90 days)
|
|
1. [Recommendation]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Appendix: Cypher Queries Used
|
|
|
|
```cypher
|
|
[Query 1]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```cypher
|
|
[Query 2]
|
|
```
|