mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Standards & References: Detecting BEC with AI
MITRE ATT&CK References
- T1566.001/002: Phishing (Spearphishing Attachment/Link)
- T1534: Internal Spearphishing
- T1656: Impersonation
- T1586.002: Compromise Accounts: Email Accounts
- T1114.003: Email Collection: Email Forwarding Rule
AI/ML Techniques for BEC Detection
| Technique | Application | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| BERT embeddings + SVC | Email classification | 98.65% |
| Transformer NLP | Writing style analysis | 96%+ |
| Anomaly detection | Behavioral baseline deviation | 94%+ |
| Graph neural networks | Communication pattern analysis | 93%+ |
| Sentiment analysis | Urgency/manipulation detection | 91%+ |
FBI IC3 BEC Statistics
- $2.9 billion losses reported in 2023
- BEC accounts for 27% of all cybercrime financial losses
- Average loss per BEC incident: $125,000
- 21,832 BEC complaints filed in 2023
Detection Categories
- Impostor Detection: AI identifies display name/domain impersonation
- Account Takeover Detection: Behavioral anomalies from compromised accounts
- Writing Style Analysis: NLP compares email to sender's historical style
- Intent Classification: ML classifies email as payment/credential/data request
- Relationship Analysis: Graph analysis of sender-recipient communication patterns