mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
56 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
56 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
# Standards Reference: Tailscale Zero Trust VPN
|
|
|
|
## Protocol Standards
|
|
|
|
### WireGuard Protocol
|
|
- **Encryption**: ChaCha20 for symmetric encryption
|
|
- **Key Exchange**: Curve25519 for Diffie-Hellman
|
|
- **MAC**: Poly1305 for message authentication
|
|
- **Hashing**: BLAKE2s for hashing
|
|
- **Framework**: Noise Protocol Framework for key negotiation
|
|
|
|
### NIST SP 800-207: Zero Trust Architecture
|
|
- Tailscale implements identity-aware proxying (Section 3.2.2)
|
|
- End-to-end encryption satisfies data-in-transit requirements
|
|
- ACL-based access control implements least privilege access
|
|
- Device identity via WireGuard keys maps to device trust
|
|
|
|
### NIST SP 800-77: Guide to IPsec VPNs
|
|
- WireGuard provides alternative to IPsec with reduced complexity
|
|
- Tailscale automates key distribution and NAT traversal
|
|
- Mesh topology eliminates single point of failure
|
|
|
|
## Tailscale Security Model
|
|
|
|
### Identity Layer
|
|
- Authentication via OIDC-compatible identity providers
|
|
- SSO integration with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, GitHub
|
|
- MFA enforcement through identity provider policies
|
|
- Key expiry forces periodic re-authentication
|
|
|
|
### Network Layer
|
|
- Default deny ACL policy (zero trust)
|
|
- Per-connection authorization based on identity and tags
|
|
- No implicit trust based on network location
|
|
- All traffic encrypted with WireGuard (256-bit keys)
|
|
|
|
### Device Layer
|
|
- Unique WireGuard key pair per device
|
|
- Device authorization required before network access
|
|
- Network Lock prevents unauthorized node addition
|
|
- Ephemeral nodes for temporary workloads
|
|
|
|
## Compliance Considerations
|
|
|
|
### SOC 2
|
|
- End-to-end encryption for data in transit
|
|
- ACL-based access control for authorization
|
|
- Audit logging for all connection events
|
|
- Key management through coordination server
|
|
|
|
### GDPR
|
|
- Data minimization: Tailscale only routes traffic, does not inspect
|
|
- Encryption: All traffic encrypted end-to-end
|
|
- Self-hosted option (Headscale) for data sovereignty
|
|
- Log retention configurable per organization policy
|