mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-07-31 16:16:26 +00:00
20e99f434c
Wave 1 remainder + Wave 2 design-first specs, completing one build plan per sub-organ: - B1 tarot emulator, B2 SOUL/Big-3, B3 Celtic Cross - C2 4+4 metacog, C3 inference cycle, C4 Brain - D1 Ada border, D2 the medium, D3 mini-rag - E1 3 GnuCOBOL invariant stores, E2 VARIANT stores, E3 RAG family - F1 MoRAG, F2 SAE monitor, F3 subagents - G1 stress-loop contract, G2 governance, G3 defense model Each: contract + stubs for independent build; unfitted constants marked C1. https://claude.ai/code/session_015hmgREHNsxYCuim33yUF2c
45 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
45 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
# G3 — Defense model *(cross-cutting · emergent)*
|
|
|
|
## 1. Component
|
|
The two-layer defense, **emergent from organs already specced** — not new code. Layer 1 = semantic
|
|
saturation (the Celtic-Cross token-flow, B3). Layer 2 = the Ada trust boundary (D1). This doc is the
|
|
contract that says how they combine.
|
|
|
|
## 2. Status / certainty
|
|
C4 — both layers decided; layer 2 is WORKING (D1), layer 1 is the B3 draw used as armor.
|
|
|
|
## 3. Language & location
|
|
Realized by B3 (token-flow) + D1 (SPARK boundary). No new module; contract doc only.
|
|
|
|
## 4. Does / does-not
|
|
- **Does:** push injection material down the attention gradient with **meaningful** content (the 10
|
|
accumulating cards), and structurally validate every crossing at Ada.
|
|
- **Does-not:** flood noise (saturation is *semantic*); watch the Brain (central cut).
|
|
|
|
## 5. Interface contract
|
|
- **Layer 1 (B3):** the iterative 10-card spread occupies context with meaningful symbol-material —
|
|
"free armour when self-hosting" (tokens = owned-hardware cycles, not API cost).
|
|
- **Layer 2 (D1):** blocklist (fetch→build→execute, base64 chains) · provenance on memory writes ·
|
|
no self-authority-reclassification · rate-limit escalation.
|
|
- **Threat corpus** kept as study specimens only (prompts.json cryptojacking, HiFi_ProToCol authority
|
|
reclass, gorkprotocol memory injection, THEORY.md hollow-math) — defended against, never built.
|
|
|
|
## 6. Dependencies & stubs
|
|
B3 (layer 1) + D1 (layer 2). Both stubbable independently; this contract just asserts they co-apply.
|
|
|
|
## 7. Invariants / laws
|
|
- **L1 (C4):** defense is **semantic saturation, not noise flooding**.
|
|
- **L2 (C5):** every crossing is structurally validated at Ada (D1 laws).
|
|
- **L3 (C5):** threat specimens are a **study corpus only** — never a build target.
|
|
|
|
## 8. Build steps
|
|
1. Ensure B3 accumulation actually fills context as designed (layer 1). 2. Ensure D1 admits/blocks per
|
|
its laws (layer 2). 3. Keep the threat corpus quarantined as reference (e.g. `reference/`), not wired.
|
|
|
|
## 9. Tests
|
|
Layer 1: spread occupies the expected context share by final cognition. Layer 2: D1 trust_tests pass.
|
|
Corpus: a static check that nothing under the threat corpus is referenced by a build target.
|
|
|
|
## 10. Open items
|
|
- Where the threat-specimen corpus lives (reference/ archive). Measuring saturation effectiveness (C1).
|