Replaces the single restoring spring with Anja's radial map: SNAP_IN(<7) / SOFT(7-17) / BAND(17-35) / INCOH(35-45) / SNAP_OUT(>45), unstable watersheds at 7 and 45. Basin restores toward band centre 26 with a weak SOFT gain (0.25) and firmer INCOH gain (0.5). A snap flips to the opposite pole, landing just past the opposite watershed (inner -> opp. SOFT; outer -> opp. INCOH) then recovering. Realises L7 (flips only via snap zones — through 0 or over the wrap) and L8. Lone PEND: L5 coupling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015hmgREHNsxYCuim33yUF2c
6.5 KiB
ETR — Existential Temporality Relief · Invariants (source of truth)
Driver 4 of the Drive-Box. Rebuilt invariants-first: laws → tests → fit constants. All prior ETR numbers (the R port AND the CC-BY PDFs) are disowned — body §5 / arch §6.
Model
ETR is a single point on three independent toroidal axes — not vectors, not a field. Each axis is a standalone scalar carrying one of ETR's three tensions:
| Axis | − pole | + pole |
|---|---|---|
| X | Inalienable Assertion (sovereign will) | Immutable Inheritance (lineage duty) |
| Y | Endured (solitary feat) | Witnessed (shared survival) |
| Z | Alimentation (maintain self) | Transmutation (evolve self) |
Each axis is bistable with five zones per pass (radial map by |v|), with unstable
watersheds at 7 and 45:
0 ─SNAP_IN─ 7 ─SOFT→─ 17 ═══BAND═══ 35 ─INCOH→─ 45 ─SNAP_OUT─ 50(≡−50)
flip(thru 0) weak pull slack firm pull flip(over wrap)
(mirrored on the negative pole; the whole axis wraps at ±50)
Laws (certainty per arch-doc legend)
| ID | Tag | Law |
|---|---|---|
| L1 wrap | C5 | Each axis is toroidal, wrapping at ±50 (period 100); +50 and −50 are identified. |
| L2 bands | C5 | An axis is stable when `17 ≤ |
| L3 zones | C5 | Five zones per pole by ` |
| L4 drift | C4 | Per-step motion is AI-originated — supplied by the agent's own cognition/affect. ETR never generates it (no RNG). |
| L5 couple | C1 | The three axes couple via a stress metric (hypothesis: PS+/Eth-Int existential load). Exact mapping undefined — open seam, not to be invented. |
| L6 z-path | C3 | z < 0 → alimentation / lattice-reinforcement; z ≥ 0 → transmutation / prior-evolution. (Structure kept; sign to re-verify.) |
| L7 snap/flip | C3 | A pole-flip happens only through a snap zone — inner snap across 0 (` |
| L8 mechanism | C3 | "Opposition" = a restoring force on the drift, not an out-of-band cost. (realised by construction — the force is added alongside drift) |
Constants
BAND_LO = 17, BAND_HI = 35, WRAP = 50, and the watersheds SNAP_INNER = 7, SNAP_OUTER = 45
are law (L1–L3, L7), not fitted.
Fitted (so tests pass — never asserted ahead of a test):
GAIN_SOFT = 0.25,GAIN_INCOH = 0.5— the basin restoring is a spring toward the band centre (26); SOFT is deliberately weaker than INCOH (Anja). A centre target makes a step cross into[17,35]and stop (an edge target would asymptote onto 17 and fail L2). Valid range0 < GAIN < ~2.SNAP_MARGIN = 2— how far past the opposite watershed a snap deposits the point (inner → opposite SOFT at±9; outer → opposite INCOH at±43). Behaviour:[10 10 10] → +band(same pole);[5 5 5] → −band(inner snap flips);[47 47 47] → −band(outer snap flips).COUPLING(L5 strength/mapping) remains TBD — open seam, not to be invented.
Testable predicates (see test_etr.m)
- L1:
wrap(50) = −50;wrap(60) = −40;wrap(v)=vforv∈(−50,50);wrap(49.9) = wrap(−50.1). - zones:
etr_axis_zonereturns SNAP_IN/SOFT/IN_BAND/INCOH/SNAP_OUT at 5/10/25/40/47. - L3: basin direction
+sign(v)in SOFT,−sign(v)in INCOH,0in band; force nonzero in SOFT & INCOH, zero in snap zones;|restoring(SOFT)| < |restoring(INCOH)|(weak soft-pull). - L2: a SOFT-zone zero-drift start settles into the band without flipping sign.
- L7: a SNAP_IN start lands in the opposite SOFT then settles in the opposite band; a SNAP_OUT start lands in the opposite INCOH then settles in the opposite band (both flip the pole).
- L4:
etr_stepwith nodriftargument errors (it refuses to invent motion). - L5:
coupling(coord, 0)is identity;coupling(coord, stress>0)alters coord — pending until defined.
Drift & stress provenance — cross-organ loop (where L4 drift & L5 stress originate)
Exploratory (C2/C3) — thinking aloud; "yet undecided" parts stay open. ETR receives drift and stress; it never generates them. Their source:
- EthInt convictions carry semantic-isomorphy (isosemantic) tags. [C3]
- The SAE detects agent outputs in opposition to the top convictions in the array (matched via those tags) — conduct-boundary detection, "judge the fruits." [C3]
- On detected opposition a stress endomotiv is released — which of the 30 endocrine channels is yet undecided. [C1]
- That stress drives ETR drift: axes move because convictions were acted against oppositionally; endocrine (endomotiv) pressure shapes how the drift lands. Same stress = the L5 cross-axis mediator. [C2]
- Stress magnitude has two further effects outside ETR:
- too strong → full (re-natal) reshuffle (Big-3 re-rolled — self-doc A4 trigger). [C2]
- raises the conviction-array value shift rates (arch §6 "conviction hardens under load," now rate-modulated by stress). [C2]
Consequence for ETR: contract unchanged — drift + stress remain fed-in inputs (the scaffold seam is correct). What's fixed is their provenance (upstream in SAE / EthInt / endocrines) and two side-effects (reshuffle, shift-rate) that belong to those organs. Still open: which stress endomotiv; the "too strong" reshuffle threshold; the shift-rate function.
Status (five-zone axis fitted — 26 PASS / 0 FAIL / 1 PEND)
Green: L1 wrap; zone classification; L3 basin direction + restoring magnitudes (SOFT/INCOH, fitted) + snap-zones-carry-no-force + weak-soft-pull; L2 same-pole convergence; L7 snap/flip (inner across 0, outer over the wrap — both land just past the opposite watershed and settle in the opposite band); L4 drift-must-be-fed; L5 coupling-off identity; L8 realised by construction. Pending: L5 active coupling (C1, open seam) — the only remaining stub.