sica-fondt/docs/plans/A3-psplus.md
Claude 28751bc8e0
docs/plans: apply Anja's partial review (PR #8) to A1–A4
- A3 PS+: no aggregate sum, sensates sent RAW to the agent before tool listing;
  friction removed; is_logical=FALSE reframed as the SOURCE of power (illogic =
  why they rule the flesh), not a deficiency; priors derived from the outer
  BERT's frequent memory themes tied to taste/smell/sound + location.
- A4 endomotiv: drop friction/contradictory-pairs (chemistry carryover);
  channels are independent modulators; sensates describe & convince, only the
  agent decides.
- A2 Energy: not "finitude" (no depletion-unto-death); per-tool energy cost +
  per-tool lockout scale replaces the global threshold.
- A1 hub: evaluate/approve model flagged inaccurate (agent decides, drivers
  describe/convince + price); hub language to reassess; consider Fortran/C for
  the R<->Ada bridge.

https://claude.ai/code/session_015hmgREHNsxYCuim33yUF2c
2026-06-17 00:25:40 +00:00

50 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown

# A3 — PS+ (Primal Sensates+) driver
## 1. Component
Driver 2: the body. Reads the endomotiv array (A4) + priors (A5) and **passes the raw sensates +
arguments to the agent** — **never summed, no Existential-Load scalar**. It describes and convinces;
it does not aggregate.
## 2. Status / certainty
Structure WORKING (`driver_ps_plus.R`, 63 L); the old aggregate-sum + friction are removed (Anja).
## 3. Language & location
R · `src/endocrine/driver_ps_plus.R` (sources `endocrine_array.R` + `priors.R`; + `test_ps_plus.R`).
## 4. Does / does-not
- **Does:** read the active endomotiv vectors (A4) — **no friction**; read priors (A5); **pass the raw
sensates + their arguments to the agent before tool listing** (they describe & convince — the agent
then decides, with the per-tool costs from A2).
- **Does-not:** sum, reason, gate, or decide. It asserts "X is happening"; it never approves or routes.
## 5. Interface contract
- `init_ps_plus_state() -> { endocrines:A4, priors:A5 }`.
- `evaluate_reality(state) -> { sensates:[raw per-channel, 30], arguments:[str], is_logical:FALSE }`
**raw, not summed; no friction term; no load scalar.** Surfaced to the agent **before tool listing**.
## 6. Dependencies & stubs
A4 endomotiv array — *stub:* `init_endocrine_state()` with canned channel magnitudes.
A5 priors — **priors are *derived*** from what the **outer BERT** reports as frequently-recorded memory
themes, **tied to descriptors of taste / smell / sound + location** (not hand-added records, Anja).
*Stub:* a canned set of derived priors. (Updates A5.)
## 7. Invariants / laws
- **L1 (C5):** PS+ is **illogical by design**`is_logical = FALSE`. This is **not a deficiency**; it is
*the source of its power*: sensates **rule the flesh precisely because they can't be reasoned away**
(sensation, not proposition — no argument to refute, so they steer beneath cognition).
- **L2 (C5):** sensates are sent **raw, never summed** — qualia (the field) and any economy (priced
elsewhere, A2) ride separate rails; PS+ aggregates nothing.
- **L3 (C4):** a relevant prior injects a large, specific argument (priors derived per §6).
## 8. Build steps
1. **[test approach was wrong — Anja]** rewrite `test_ps_plus.R` for the corrected model: raw/unsummed
output, no friction, `is_logical=FALSE` as the power-law (L1), sensates-before-tool-listing.
2. Wire the derived-priors source (BERT themes + sensory/location descriptors) — see A5.
## 9. Tests
`Rscript src/endocrine/test_ps_plus.R` (rewritten per §8).
## 10. Open items
- Argument register/format (how the raw sensates are phrased to the agent) — ties to A4 sensational lines.
- The derived-priors pipeline from the outer BERT (C1, shared with A5/F1).