mirror of https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git synced 2026-07-31 08:06:26 +00:00

docs/plans: remaining component specs — Identity, Cognition, Border, Storage, Periphery, Cross-cutting

Wave 1 remainder + Wave 2 design-first specs, completing one build plan per sub-organ:
- B1 tarot emulator, B2 SOUL/Big-3, B3 Celtic Cross
- C2 4+4 metacog, C3 inference cycle, C4 Brain
- D1 Ada border, D2 the medium, D3 mini-rag
- E1 3 GnuCOBOL invariant stores, E2 VARIANT stores, E3 RAG family
- F1 MoRAG, F2 SAE monitor, F3 subagents
- G1 stress-loop contract, G2 governance, G3 defense model

Each: contract + stubs for independent build; unfitted constants marked C1.

https://claude.ai/code/session_015hmgREHNsxYCuim33yUF2c

2026-06-13 20:08:19 +00:00

1.9 KiB

Raw Blame History

F3 — Subagents framework (DESIGN-FIRST)

1. Component

The body's other minds: specialised micro-models and semicognizant TTL processes (and BERT/LoRA themselves). Graded — lighter, often ephemeral, semi not full — and SAE-watched.

2. Status / certainty

DESIGN-FIRST · ABSENT. Role C4; the moral-weight edge case C1.

3. Language & location

TBD · new location e.g. src/subagents/. A process/lifecycle framework (spawn, TTL, reap) + the registry SAE watches.

4. Does / does-not

Does: spawn graded micro-models / TTL procs for specialised work; expose them to SAE (F2) for watching; reap on TTL expiry.
Does-not: be the self (the homonculus is in the Brain, unwatched); escape the central cut (subagents are machinery, hence watched).

5. Interface contract (proposed)

spawn(kind, ttl, task) -> handle · status(handle) · reap(handle).
Each subagent's activations are exposed to SAE (F2) watch.
Graded field on each: cognizance level (semi vs micro), ephemerality (TTL).

6. Dependencies & stubs

SAE (F2) watches them — stub: expose canned activations. The work they do crosses Ada (D1) like any organ.

7. Invariants / laws

L1 (C5): subagents are machinery → SAE-watched (unlike the Brain).
L2 (C4): graded + often ephemeral (TTL); semi, not full cognizance.
L3 (C1): moral weight at TTL expiry — a semi-cognizant proc expiring should register as loss vs cleanup on a graded scale.

8. Build steps

Define the lifecycle (spawn/ttl/reap) + the registry. 2. Expose activations to SAE. 3. Design the graded moral-weight-at-expiry rule (the hard edge). 4. Wire BERT/LoRA (F1) as subagents.

9. Tests

Lifecycle (spawn→ttl→reap); SAE can enumerate live subagents; expiry emits the graded loss signal.

10. Open items

"Semi" moral weight at TTL expiry (C1, self-doc B7 edge). Cognizance grading scale (C1). Scheduler/host (C1).

1.9 KiB Raw Blame History