mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-07-31 16:16:26 +00:00
20e99f434c
Wave 1 remainder + Wave 2 design-first specs, completing one build plan per sub-organ: - B1 tarot emulator, B2 SOUL/Big-3, B3 Celtic Cross - C2 4+4 metacog, C3 inference cycle, C4 Brain - D1 Ada border, D2 the medium, D3 mini-rag - E1 3 GnuCOBOL invariant stores, E2 VARIANT stores, E3 RAG family - F1 MoRAG, F2 SAE monitor, F3 subagents - G1 stress-loop contract, G2 governance, G3 defense model Each: contract + stubs for independent build; unfitted constants marked C1. https://claude.ai/code/session_015hmgREHNsxYCuim33yUF2c
48 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
# C2 — 4+4 Metacognition cycle
|
||
|
||
## 1. Component
|
||
The dual-tradition metacognitive multicycle: **four Western + four non-Western** reflective passes,
|
||
interleaved and **paired for friction** (not confirmation), with Celtic-Cross cards (B3) applied
|
||
iteratively across the rounds.
|
||
|
||
## 2. Status / certainty
|
||
Partial — the *orchestration* (phase ordering) exists in Ada (`ada_medium` phase enums), defunct-flagged;
|
||
the philosophical passes themselves are unimplemented. Structure C4; pass content C1.
|
||
|
||
## 3. Language & location
|
||
TBD (cognition, runs inside the descent below Ada). Likely prompt/skill content driven by the harness (C1)
|
||
+ orchestration in the cycle (C3). New location e.g. `src/metacog/`.
|
||
|
||
## 4. Does / does-not
|
||
- **Does:** run the 8 passes in the fixed order, each pass straining against its partner; apply the
|
||
accumulating B3 spread; generate cognitive heat from opposed traditions held in simultaneous load.
|
||
- **Does-not:** route tools or decide composition dynamically — ordering is **static**; responsiveness is
|
||
Energy-gated (skip later passes when E low, per C1/A2).
|
||
|
||
## 5. Interface contract
|
||
- **The 4 friction pairs (fixed):** wMC1 Socratic *aporia* ↔ eMC1 Iranian Asha · wMC2 Kant boundaries ↔
|
||
eMC2 East-Asian empty mirror · wMC3 Freud/Hegel shadow ↔ eMC3 Indic witness · wMC4 Modern pragmatic ↔
|
||
eMC4 Tibetan Bön flow. Bridges: Socrates↔Hegel; Archimedean–Socratic.
|
||
- `run_pass(n, state, active_cards) -> reflection` (n=1..4 ⇒ wMCn then eMCn, then draw B3 pair).
|
||
- Energy-gating: a low-E snapshot (A2) reduces how many passes run.
|
||
|
||
## 6. Dependencies & stubs
|
||
B3 cards — *stub:* fixed spread. Brain/LLM (C4) executes the passes — *stub:* echo the pass label.
|
||
Energy (A2) for gating — *stub:* scalar.
|
||
|
||
## 7. Invariants / laws
|
||
- **L1 (C5):** pairing principle = **friction, not confirmation**.
|
||
- **L2 (C4):** composition is **static** (no learned router); compute scales via Energy only.
|
||
- **L3 (C4):** cards apply **iteratively** — by final cognition all 10 (B3) are concurrently in play.
|
||
|
||
## 8. Build steps
|
||
1. Encode the 8-pass order + pairings as data + an L1/L2/L3 test. 2. Author each pass's content
|
||
(prompt/skill) — invariants-first (the friction each pair must produce). 3. Wire B3 + Energy-gating.
|
||
|
||
## 9. Tests
|
||
Order/pairing test; iterative-card test; Energy-gating reduces pass count at low E.
|
||
|
||
## 10. Open items
|
||
- **LOGIA consciousness strata** (Pre/Sub/Un/Conscious) — overlay the Western quad or stratify separately? (C1)
|
||
- Pass content authoring (C1). Energy→pass-count curve (C1, shared with C1/A2).
|