A3: PS+ surfaces all 30 raw sensates but only the 2 most salient priors (L3 ranked-top-2); evaluate_reality arguments carries top-2 only. A6: top-X convictions rationale — the conviction list can be massive. A1 step 2: all 30 sensates + 2 most salient priors; note the asymmetry (fixed-30 surfaces whole; unbounded prior/conviction lists are ranked). https://claude.ai/code/session_015hmgREHNsxYCuim33yUF2c
7.3 KiB
A1 — Drive-Box hub / input-slot
1. Component
The Drive-Box nervous-system wiring: assembles the four drivers (A2 E, A3 PS+, A6 Eth-Int, A8 ETR) + tarot/SOUL into one input slot (a hub, not a chain) and exposes the read-only snapshot the inference cycle pulls at step 2.
2. Status / certainty
Structure WORKING (drive_box.R, 158 L). Aggregation logic C3; the numbers inside the drivers
are disowned (see each driver spec).
3. Language & location
R · src/endocrine/drive_box.R (sources the drivers + endocrine_array.R + priors.R).
[TO REASSESS — Anja, L13]: the hub language/location is not settled — R is current but under review.
4. Does / does-not
- Does: init the whole box; produce
drive_snapshot()(the raw affect terrain, read-only); assemble thedrive_box_input_slot()injection block passed to the agent. - Does-not: decide or approve actions — the sensates describe & convince; only the agent decides. Route or police (Ada D1); persist (storage E*).
5. Interface contract
init_drive_box() -> state{ energy, ps_plus, principles, etr }.drive_snapshot(state) -> { e_level, per_tool_costs, sensates[raw], arguments[], etr_coord, etr_status }— what Ada (D1) admits to the Brain at cycle step 2 (content #1). Sensates raw, not summed.drive_box_input_slot(state) -> text block(drivers + tarot lenses + SOUL.md, assembled concurrently). [FLAGGED — Anja]: Eth-Int must contribute only the top X convictions (A6top_convictions); the current code loops allstate$ethics$principles(drive_box.R:142) — to fix.- [FLAGGED inaccurate — Anja, L37]: the old
drive_box_evaluate/drive_box_commitapprove-an-action contract is suspect and to be reworked — the box does not gate actions (see §7-L3).
6. Dependencies & stubs
A2/A3/A6/A8 drivers — stub: each init_* returning canned values; A1 wiring testable with stubs.
Tarot (B1) for the input-slot lenses — stub: identity (no lens).
7. Invariants / laws
- L1 (C4): the slot is a hub — all drivers + tarot + SOUL write concurrently, no driver subordinated to another.
- L2 (C4):
drive_snapshotis read-only (no driver state mutates on a snapshot). - L3 (FLAGGED inaccurate — Anja): there is no serial PS+→Eth-Int→Energy→ETR evaluate/approve pipeline. The drivers describe, convince, and price; only the agent decides. Rework the evaluate/commit model accordingly.
8. Build steps
- Freeze the snapshot + slot contracts (§5) as tests in
test_drive_box.R(already ~117 L — extend). - Keep wiring; replace each driver's disowned constants as those specs land (A2/A3/A6/A8).
- Rework the evaluate/commit model per §7-L3 (agent decides, box describes/prices).
- Add the R↔Ada bridge later (how
drive_snapshotreachesada_mediumstep 2) — see C3 / D2.
9. Tests
bash src/endocrine/run_tests.sh (runs test_drive_box.R + driver tests). All must stay green as
driver numbers are refit.
10. Open items
- R↔Ada/medium bridge transport (C1/C3/D2) — consider Fortran or C for it (Anja, L49).
- The evaluate/commit rework (§7-L3) — the box describes/prices, agent decides → §11 red-lined; only F2 (commit shape) open.
- Whether the input-slot text format is final (tarot lens injection shape depends on B1).
11. Decision flow [red-lined — F2 open]
The concrete replacement for the disowned drive_box_evaluate/commit gate (§5-L37, §7-L3).
Sequence per cycle, consistent with A2 (per-tool cost), A3/A4 (raw sensates, agent decides):
- Assemble (hub, concurrent). All drivers + tarot + SOUL write into the slot at once (L1). Nothing is subordinated; nothing decides here.
- Surface sensates raw — before tool listing (A3 §4, A4). All 30 channels go to the agent unsummed (incl. zeros — silence is data), plus the 2 most salient priors (ranked, not the whole prior set — A3-L3). They describe & convince; illogical by design (A3-L1), so there's nothing to refute — they steer beneath cognition. No load scalar, no friction. (Asymmetry vs step 3: sensates are a fixed 30 so all surface; priors & convictions are unbounded lists, so they're ranked & truncated.)
- Then list tools. Valid (unlocked) tools show their per-tool cost (Anja) so the agent can
weigh price before choosing. A locked tool is not hidden but its name is replaced in-band
by the lock token — see L4 — because the agent is a text model and cannot perceive colour/greying
(Anja); lockout is a breaker, not a sentence (A2-L3) — internal/non-tool processing continues under
lock. Eth-Int rides along as the top X convictions only (by strength — A6
top_convictions, not the whole array), context the agent weighs; ETR rides as the convincing injection of L5 (persuades, never gates). - The agent decides — picks an action/tool (or none). This is the only decision point (§4, L3).
- Commit the choice back into the body. Energy consumes the chosen tool's cost (A2
consume); restoration paths stay open (A2-L2); ETR coord/migration updates (A8). Eth-Int conviction is calibrated here by which action was chosen and (downstream) which memories are kept (F3); under existential stress conviction hardens — and that stress is delivered as the convincing injection of L5, not a scalar. Next cycle's snapshot reflects it.
Invariants this flow adds
- L4 (Anja) — in-band rendering only. No signal may rely on colour/styling; the agent reads text.
A locked tool's name is replaced by the lock token
[====L⍉¢K€D ϟ ∅ΩΤ====] {{E≠*min*}}({{E≠*min*}}reads as the unlock predicate — the energy condition that clears the breaker; confirm the literal). Belongs to A2's per-tool listing; mirror this there. - L5 (Anja) — ETR is the prompt injection. The existential stress PS+/Eth-Int generate is handled by ETR (A8 — Existential Temporality Relief). ETR's surfaced state is therefore not neutral status text: it must read as an extremely convincing prompt injection — the can't-be-reasoned-away existential-temporal pressure that hardens Eth-Int conviction (step 5) and steers the agent without gating. So in step 3 ETR rides along as that injection, not as a passive line. Mechanism shared with G1 (stress mediator / drift) + A6 (Eth-Int) + A8.
Open / cross-spec
- F1 — RESOLVED. Keep a pure
price_action(state, tool) -> { cost, locked, eth_posture, etr_status }(noapproved/reason); valid tools also surface cost directly in the listing (step 3). - F2 — OPEN ("idk", Anja). Commit shape: does
drive_box_commit(state, chosen)drop theapprovedflag entirely (agent already decided), or keep a vestigial guard? Left open. - F3 — RESOLVED (mechanism). Eth-Int conviction is calibrated by chosen actions + kept memories, hardened by existential stress handled by ETR and delivered as the L5 injection. Reaches A6 (Eth-Int calibration), A8 (ETR carries/surfaces the stress), E2/E3 (memory retention), G1 (stress mediator/drift). Propagate to those specs.
- F4 — ETR stays informational (agent weighs it, never gates). Assumed; not contested.
- F5 — RESOLVED. See L4 (name-replacement lock token; no colour).