mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
50 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
# API Reference: Triaging Security Incidents with IR Playbooks
|
|
|
|
## Incident Classification Types
|
|
|
|
| Type | Keywords | Default Severity | Playbook |
|
|
|------|----------|-----------------|----------|
|
|
| Malware | trojan, ransomware, c2, beacon | High | malware-infection-playbook |
|
|
| Phishing | credential harvest, BEC, spear-phishing | Medium | phishing-response-playbook |
|
|
| Data Exfiltration | DLP, dns tunnel, large upload | Critical | data-exfiltration-playbook |
|
|
| Unauthorized Access | brute force, lateral movement | High | unauthorized-access-playbook |
|
|
| Denial of Service | DDoS, SYN flood, volumetric | High | ddos-response-playbook |
|
|
| Insider Threat | policy violation, terminated user | High | insider-threat-playbook |
|
|
| Web Attack | SQLi, XSS, web shell, RCE | High | web-attack-playbook |
|
|
|
|
## Severity Matrix
|
|
|
|
| Context Factor | Severity Override |
|
|
|----------------|-------------------|
|
|
| Crown jewel system affected | Critical |
|
|
| Active exploitation confirmed | Critical |
|
|
| Multiple systems (>5) affected | High |
|
|
| Single system affected | Medium |
|
|
| Reconnaissance only | Low |
|
|
| Minor policy violation | Informational |
|
|
|
|
## Escalation Paths
|
|
|
|
| Severity | Response Time | Escalation |
|
|
|----------|---------------|------------|
|
|
| Critical | 15 minutes | IR Team + CISO + Legal |
|
|
| High | 1 hour | SOC Tier 2 + IR Team |
|
|
| Medium | 4 hours | SOC Tier 2 |
|
|
| Low | 24 hours | SOC Tier 1 |
|
|
| Informational | Next business day | SOC Tier 1 |
|
|
|
|
## Python Libraries
|
|
|
|
| Library | Version | Purpose |
|
|
|---------|---------|---------|
|
|
| `json` | stdlib | Alert parsing and report generation |
|
|
| `enum` | stdlib | Severity level enumeration |
|
|
| `pathlib` | stdlib | Output directory management |
|
|
| `datetime` | stdlib | Triage timestamps |
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
- NIST SP 800-61r2: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-61/rev-2/final
|
|
- SANS Incident Handler's Handbook: https://www.sans.org/white-papers/33901/
|
|
- TheHive: https://thehive-project.org/
|