Claude 24f816b6a3
Consolidate 22 sibling repos into layered organism structure
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):

- brain/        LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
                dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/    LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
                MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/    defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser

License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.

Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
2026-06-10 06:53:01 +00:00

59 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown

# Standards and References - Container Image Scanning with Grype
## Industry Standards
### NIST SP 800-190: Application Container Security Guide
- Section 4.1: Image vulnerabilities - Recommends scanning images for known vulnerabilities before deployment
- Section 4.2: Image configuration defects - Covers misconfigurations in container images
- Recommends integrating vulnerability scanning into CI/CD pipelines
### CIS Docker Benchmark v1.6
- Rule 4.1: Ensure a user for the container has been created
- Rule 4.6: Add HEALTHCHECK instruction to the container image
- Rule 4.9: Ensure that COPY is used instead of ADD
- Rule 4.10: Ensure secrets are not stored in Dockerfiles
### NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
- RA-5: Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning
- SI-2: Flaw Remediation
- CM-6: Configuration Settings
- SA-11: Developer Security Testing and Evaluation
### OWASP Container Security
- VS-001: Vulnerability Scanning - Scan container images for known vulnerabilities
- VS-002: SBOM Generation - Generate and maintain software bill of materials
- VS-003: Base Image Selection - Use minimal, trusted base images
## Vulnerability Databases
| Database | URL | Update Frequency |
|----------|-----|-----------------|
| NVD (National Vulnerability Database) | https://nvd.nist.gov/ | Continuous |
| GitHub Advisory Database | https://github.com/advisories | Continuous |
| OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities) | https://osv.dev/ | Continuous |
| Alpine SecDB | https://secdb.alpinelinux.org/ | Daily |
| Debian Security Tracker | https://security-tracker.debian.org/ | Daily |
## CVSS Scoring Reference
| Severity | CVSS v3.1 Score | Recommended Action |
|----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| Critical | 9.0 - 10.0 | Block deployment, immediate remediation |
| High | 7.0 - 8.9 | Block deployment in production |
| Medium | 4.0 - 6.9 | Track and remediate within SLA |
| Low | 0.1 - 3.9 | Accept risk or remediate in next cycle |
| None | 0.0 | Informational |
## Compliance Mappings
### PCI DSS v4.0
- Requirement 6.3.1: Identify and manage security vulnerabilities
- Requirement 6.3.3: Update system components to address known vulnerabilities
### SOC 2
- CC7.1: To meet its objectives, the entity uses detection and monitoring procedures to identify changes to configurations that result in the introduction of new vulnerabilities
### FedRAMP
- RA-5(2): Update the vulnerabilities scanned within every 30 days prior to a new scan
- RA-5(5): Implement privileged access authorization for vulnerability scanning activities