mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
2.5 KiB
2.5 KiB
API Reference: SOC Tabletop Exercise Agent
Overview
Manages SOC tabletop exercise lifecycle: scenario generation from templates, participant tracking, inject delivery, response scoring, and after-action report generation.
Dependencies
| Package | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| json | stdlib | Report serialization |
| datetime | stdlib | Exercise scheduling and IDs |
Core Functions
create_exercise(scenario_type, participants, duration_hours=3)
Creates a structured tabletop exercise from a scenario template.
- Parameters:
scenario_type(str) - one ofransomware,data_breach,supply_chain;participants(list[dict]) - role/count pairs - Returns:
dict- full exercise object with phases and objectives
score_response(category, score)
Scores participant response in a specific evaluation category.
- Parameters:
category(str) - one ofdetection_and_triage,containment_decision,communication,business_continuity;score(int) - 0-100 - Returns:
dict- category, score, rating, weight
calculate_overall_score(scores)
Computes weighted average across all scored categories.
- Parameters:
scores(list[dict]) - output fromscore_response - Returns:
float- overall score
generate_after_action_report(exercise, scores, gaps, strengths)
Produces the formal after-action report document.
- Parameters:
exercise(dict),scores(list),gaps(list[dict]),strengths(list[str]) - Returns:
dict- AAR with scores, findings, and next exercise date
Scenario Templates
| Template | Phases | Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|
ransomware |
6 injects | Detection, containment, ransom decision, recovery |
data_breach |
4 injects | DLP, insider threat, PII notification |
supply_chain |
4 injects | Vendor compromise, lateral movement, credential reset |
Scoring Criteria
| Category | Weight | Rating Thresholds |
|---|---|---|
| detection_and_triage | 25% | >=85 Excellent, >=70 Good, >=55 Adequate |
| containment_decision | 25% | >=85 Excellent, >=70 Good, >=55 Adequate |
| communication | 25% | >=85 Excellent, >=70 Good, >=55 Adequate |
| business_continuity | 25% | >=85 Excellent, >=70 Good, >=55 Adequate |
Output Schema
{
"exercise_id": "TTX-2026-Q1",
"overall_score": "72/100 (Adequate)",
"scores": {"detection_and_triage": "85/100 (Excellent)"},
"gaps": [{"finding": "...", "risk": "High", "owner": "SOC Manager"}],
"strengths": ["Ransomware indicators correctly identified"]
}