mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
API Reference — Performing Physical Intrusion Assessment
Libraries Used
- csv: Generate and parse assessment checklists
- pathlib: File operations
CLI Interface
python agent.py checklist [--categories perimeter access_control server_room social_engineering] [--output checklist.csv]
python agent.py score --csv completed_assessment.csv
python agent.py report --csv completed_assessment.csv
Core Functions
generate_checklist(categories, output_file) — Create assessment template
22 checks across 4 categories with severity ratings. Outputs to CSV.
score_assessment(results_csv) — Calculate compliance score
Groups by category and severity. Identifies critical failures.
generate_report(results_csv) — Executive summary with risk level
Assessment Categories (22 checks)
| Category | Checks | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Perimeter Security | 5 | Fencing, CCTV, lighting, barriers |
| Access Control | 6 | Badge access, tailgating, visitor policy |
| Server Room | 6 | MFA, CCTV, environmental, access logs |
| Social Engineering | 5 | Visitor challenge, clean desk, shredding |
Risk Classification
- CRITICAL: Critical control failures found
- HIGH: >5 failed checks
- MEDIUM: 1-5 failed checks
- LOW: All checks passed
Dependencies
No external packages — Python standard library only.