mirror of https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git synced 2026-08-01 16:40:24 +00:00

Consolidate 22 sibling repos into layered organism structure

Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):

- brain/        LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
                dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/    LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
                MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/    defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser

License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.

Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c

2026-06-10 06:53:01 +00:00

3.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

External Network Penetration Test — Report Template

Document Control

Field	Value
Client	[Client Name]
Assessment Type	External Network Penetration Test
Test Period	[Start Date] — [End Date]
Report Version	1.0
Classification	CONFIDENTIAL
Prepared By	[Tester Name], [Certification]
Reviewed By	[QA Reviewer]
Authorization ID	[PENTEST-YYYY-EXT-NNN]

1. Executive Summary

1.1 Engagement Overview

[Organization Name] engaged [Testing Company] to perform an external network penetration test against its internet-facing infrastructure. The assessment was conducted between [dates] following the PTES methodology.

1.2 Scope

IP Ranges: [CIDR ranges]
Domains: [domain list]
Exclusions: [excluded assets]

1.3 Key Findings Summary

Severity	Count
Critical	[N]
High	[N]
Medium	[N]
Low	[N]
Informational	[N]

1.4 Overall Risk Rating

[CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW]

[Brief narrative of overall security posture]

1.5 Top Strategic Recommendations

[Recommendation 1]
[Recommendation 2]
[Recommendation 3]

2. Technical Findings

Finding [N]: [Title]

Attribute	Detail
Severity	[Critical/High/Medium/Low]
CVSS v3.1	[Score] — [Vector String]
CVE	[CVE-YYYY-NNNNN]
CWE	[CWE-NNN]
Affected Asset	[IP/hostname:port]
Status	[Exploited / Validated / Potential]

Description: [Detailed description of the vulnerability]

Impact: [Business and technical impact]

Steps to Reproduce:

[Step 1]
[Step 2]
[Step 3]

Evidence:

[Terminal output / HTTP request-response]

Remediation:

[Primary fix]
[Alternative mitigation]
[Detection recommendation]

References:

[URL to CVE/advisory]
[Vendor documentation]

3. Methodology

3.1 Framework

PTES (Penetration Testing Execution Standard)
OWASP Testing Guide v4.2
MITRE ATT&CK Framework

3.2 Tools Used

Tool	Version	Purpose
Nmap	[ver]	Port scanning, service enumeration
Metasploit	[ver]	Exploitation framework
Burp Suite Pro	[ver]	Web application testing
Nuclei	[ver]	Vulnerability scanning
SQLMap	[ver]	SQL injection testing
Hashcat	[ver]	Password cracking

3.3 Testing Timeline

Date	Phase	Activities
[Date]	Reconnaissance	OSINT, subdomain enum, port scanning
[Date]	Vulnerability Analysis	Automated and manual scanning
[Date]	Exploitation	Service and web application exploitation
[Date]	Post-Exploitation	Privilege escalation, evidence collection
[Date]	Reporting	Findings documentation and QA

4. Appendices

A. Full Scan Results

[Attached as separate files]

B. Network Topology Discovered

[Network diagram]

C. Credentials Obtained

Source	Account Type	Method
[Service]	[Role]	[Attack method]

D. Glossary

Term	Definition
CVSS	Common Vulnerability Scoring System
CVE	Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures
RCE	Remote Code Execution
PTES	Penetration Testing Execution Standard

This document is classified CONFIDENTIAL and intended solely for [Client Name].

3.4 KiB Raw Blame History