mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 16:40:24 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
2.7 KiB
2.7 KiB
Workflows: Performing DMARC Policy Enforcement Rollout
Workflow 1: DMARC Phased Rollout
Week 1-2: Discovery
|
v
[Inventory all legitimate email sending sources]
+-- Internal mail servers
+-- Third-party SaaS (marketing, CRM, support)
+-- Transactional email services
+-- Application-generated email
|
v
Week 2-4: Foundation
|
v
[Configure SPF and DKIM for all sources]
+-- Publish SPF record with all includes
+-- Validate SPF under 10 lookup limit
+-- Generate DKIM keys per sending source
+-- Test outbound authentication
|
v
Week 4-6: Monitor
|
v
[Publish p=none DMARC record]
+-- Collect aggregate reports for 2 weeks
+-- Analyze: who is sending as your domain?
+-- Fix alignment failures for legitimate sources
+-- Identify unauthorized/spoofing sources
|
v
Week 6-12: Quarantine
|
v
[Move to p=quarantine with gradual pct increase]
+-- pct=10 (2 weeks) -> check false positives
+-- pct=25 (2 weeks) -> verify clean
+-- pct=50 (1 week) -> validate stability
+-- pct=100 (2 weeks) -> confirm all legitimate passes
|
v
Week 12-20: Reject
|
v
[Move to p=reject with gradual pct increase]
+-- pct=10 (2 weeks) -> monitor rejections
+-- pct=25 (2 weeks) -> verify no legitimate blocked
+-- pct=50 (1 week) -> near full enforcement
+-- pct=100 -> FULL ENFORCEMENT ACHIEVED
|
v
Ongoing: Maintenance
+-- Monitor aggregate reports monthly
+-- Update SPF/DKIM for new sending sources
+-- Rotate DKIM keys annually
Workflow 2: DMARC Report Analysis
Aggregate report received (daily XML)
|
v
[Parse report in DMARC analyzer]
|
v
[Categorize sending sources]
+-- PASS: Legitimate, properly authenticated
+-- FAIL (known): Legitimate source with auth issue -> FIX
+-- FAIL (unknown): Unauthorized sender -> INVESTIGATE
|
v
[For each FAIL (known)]
+-- Identify missing SPF include or DKIM config
+-- Update DNS records
+-- Wait for next report to confirm fix
|
v
[For each FAIL (unknown)]
+-- Is it spoofing? -> Document for enforcement case
+-- Is it shadow IT? -> Onboard or decommission
+-- Is it forwarding? -> ARC chain may be needed
Workflow 3: Emergency Rollback
Legitimate email being rejected (false positive detected)
|
v
[Immediate: Roll back pct or policy]
+-- Reduce pct to previous stable level
+-- OR roll back from reject to quarantine
+-- OR roll back from quarantine to none
|
v
[Investigate root cause]
+-- Check aggregate reports for failing source
+-- Verify SPF/DKIM configuration for source
+-- Check for forwarding or mailing list issues
|
v
[Fix and re-advance]
+-- Correct authentication issue
+-- Verify fix in next report cycle
+-- Resume gradual pct advancement