Claude 24f816b6a3
Consolidate 22 sibling repos into layered organism structure
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):

- brain/        LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
                dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/    LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
                MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/    defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser

License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.

Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
2026-06-10 06:53:01 +00:00

41 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# API Reference: Access Review and Certification
## CSV Input Format
```csv
username,entitlement,application,manager,status,last_used,risk_score
jsmith,Admin,SAP,mjones,active,2025-01-15T00:00:00Z,8
```
## SoD Rules JSON Format
```json
[{"name": "Finance SoD", "role_a": "AP_Approver", "role_b": "AP_Creator"}]
```
## Key Review Checks
| Check | Description | Severity |
|-------|-------------|----------|
| Orphaned accounts | No manager or terminated status | HIGH |
| SoD violations | Conflicting entitlements held | CRITICAL |
| Excessive access | Entitlement count above threshold | MEDIUM |
| Stale entitlements | Unused beyond retention period | MEDIUM |
## Compliance Frameworks
| Framework | Requirement |
|-----------|-------------|
| SOX Section 404 | Periodic access reviews for financial systems |
| SOC 2 CC6.1 | Logical access controls and reviews |
| HIPAA 164.312(a) | Access authorization and review |
| PCI DSS 7.2 | Restrict access based on need-to-know |
## Review Campaign Design
| Parameter | Best Practice |
|-----------|---------------|
| Frequency | Quarterly for privileged, semi-annual for standard |
| Reviewer | Direct manager + application owner |
| Escalation | Auto-revoke if no response within 14 days |
| Evidence | Export decisions with timestamps and reviewer ID |
## References
- NIST SP 800-53 AC-6: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final
- ISACA Access Review: https://www.isaca.org/