mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-08-01 08:30:20 +00:00
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):
- brain/ LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/ LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/ defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser
License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.
Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
204 lines
8.6 KiB
Markdown
204 lines
8.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: hardening-windows-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark
|
|
description: 'Hardens Windows endpoints using CIS (Center for Internet Security) Benchmark recommendations to reduce attack
|
|
surface, enforce security baselines, and meet compliance requirements. Use when deploying new Windows workstations or servers,
|
|
remediating audit findings, or establishing organization-wide security baselines. Activates for requests involving Windows
|
|
hardening, CIS benchmarks, GPO security baselines, or endpoint configuration compliance.
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
domain: cybersecurity
|
|
subdomain: endpoint-security
|
|
tags:
|
|
- endpoint
|
|
- hardening
|
|
- windows-security
|
|
- CIS-benchmark
|
|
- GPO
|
|
- baseline-configuration
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
author: mahipal
|
|
license: Apache-2.0
|
|
nist_csf:
|
|
- PR.PS-01
|
|
- PR.PS-02
|
|
- DE.CM-01
|
|
- PR.IR-01
|
|
---
|
|
# Hardening Windows Endpoint with CIS Benchmark
|
|
|
|
## When to Use
|
|
|
|
Use this skill when:
|
|
- Deploying new Windows 10/11 or Server 2019/2022 endpoints that require security hardening
|
|
- Establishing organization-wide security baselines using CIS Level 1 or Level 2 profiles
|
|
- Remediating findings from compliance audits (PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2) that reference CIS benchmarks
|
|
- Validating existing endpoint configurations against current CIS benchmark versions
|
|
|
|
**Do not use** this skill for Linux endpoints (use hardening-linux-endpoint-with-cis-benchmark) or for cloud-native workloads that require CIS cloud benchmarks.
|
|
|
|
## Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
- Windows 10/11 Enterprise or Windows Server 2019/2022 target endpoints
|
|
- Active Directory Group Policy Management Console (GPMC) for enterprise deployment
|
|
- CIS-CAT Pro Assessor or CIS-CAT Lite for automated benchmark assessment
|
|
- Administrative access to target endpoints or domain controller
|
|
- Current CIS Benchmark PDF for the target Windows version (download from cisecurity.org)
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Select CIS Benchmark Profile Level
|
|
|
|
CIS provides two profile levels for Windows endpoints:
|
|
|
|
**Level 1 (L1) - Corporate/Enterprise Environment**:
|
|
- Practical hardening settings that can be applied to most organizations
|
|
- Minimal impact on functionality and user experience
|
|
- Covers: password policy, audit policy, user rights, security options, Windows Firewall
|
|
|
|
**Level 2 (L2) - High Security/Sensitive Data**:
|
|
- Includes all L1 settings plus additional restrictions
|
|
- May impact usability (disabling autorun, restricting remote desktop, enhanced audit logging)
|
|
- Appropriate for systems handling PII, PHI, PCI data, or classified information
|
|
|
|
Select profile based on data classification and risk tolerance of the endpoint.
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Import CIS GPO Baselines
|
|
|
|
CIS provides pre-built GPO templates (Build Kits) for each benchmark version:
|
|
|
|
```powershell
|
|
# Download CIS Build Kit from CIS WorkBench (requires CIS SecureSuite membership)
|
|
# Extract the GPO backup to a staging directory
|
|
|
|
# Import the CIS GPO into Active Directory
|
|
Import-GPO -BackupGpoName "CIS Microsoft Windows 11 Enterprise v3.0.0 L1" `
|
|
-TargetName "CIS-Win11-L1-Baseline" `
|
|
-Path "C:\CIS-GPO-Backups\Win11-Enterprise" `
|
|
-CreateIfNeeded
|
|
|
|
# Link GPO to target OU
|
|
New-GPLink -Name "CIS-Win11-L1-Baseline" `
|
|
-Target "OU=Workstations,DC=corp,DC=example,DC=com" `
|
|
-LinkEnabled Yes
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: Apply Key CIS Benchmark Categories
|
|
|
|
**Account Policies (Section 1)**:
|
|
```
|
|
Password Policy:
|
|
- Minimum password length: 14 characters (1.1.4)
|
|
- Maximum password age: 365 days (1.1.3)
|
|
- Password complexity: Enabled (1.1.5)
|
|
- Store passwords using reversible encryption: Disabled (1.1.6)
|
|
|
|
Account Lockout Policy:
|
|
- Account lockout threshold: 5 invalid logon attempts (1.2.1)
|
|
- Account lockout duration: 15 minutes (1.2.2)
|
|
- Reset account lockout counter after: 15 minutes (1.2.3)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Local Policies - Audit Policy (Section 17)**:
|
|
```
|
|
Audit Policy Configuration:
|
|
- Audit Credential Validation: Success and Failure (17.1.1)
|
|
- Audit Security Group Management: Success (17.2.5)
|
|
- Audit Logon: Success and Failure (17.5.1)
|
|
- Audit Process Creation: Success (17.6.1)
|
|
- Audit Removable Storage: Success and Failure (17.6.4)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Security Options (Section 2.3)**:
|
|
```
|
|
- Interactive logon: Do not display last user name: Enabled (2.3.7.1)
|
|
- Interactive logon: Machine inactivity limit: 900 seconds (2.3.7.3)
|
|
- Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts: Enabled (2.3.10.2)
|
|
- Network security: LAN Manager authentication level: Send NTLMv2 response only (2.3.11.7)
|
|
- UAC: Run all administrators in Admin Approval Mode: Enabled (2.3.17.6)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Windows Firewall (Section 9)**:
|
|
```
|
|
- Domain Profile: Firewall state: On (9.1.1)
|
|
- Domain Profile: Inbound connections: Block (9.1.2)
|
|
- Private Profile: Firewall state: On (9.2.1)
|
|
- Public Profile: Firewall state: On (9.3.1)
|
|
- Public Profile: Inbound connections: Block (9.3.2)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 4: Validate with CIS-CAT Assessment
|
|
|
|
```powershell
|
|
# Run CIS-CAT Pro Assessor against target endpoint
|
|
# CIS-CAT produces an HTML/XML report with pass/fail per recommendation
|
|
|
|
.\Assessor-CLI.bat `
|
|
-b "benchmarks\CIS_Microsoft_Windows_11_Enterprise_Benchmark_v3.0.0-xccdf.xml" `
|
|
-p "Level 1 (L1) - Corporate/Enterprise Environment" `
|
|
-rd "C:\CIS-Reports" `
|
|
-nts
|
|
|
|
# Review report for failed controls
|
|
# Score target: 95%+ for L1, 90%+ for L2 (due to operational exceptions)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 5: Document Exceptions and Compensating Controls
|
|
|
|
For each CIS recommendation that cannot be applied:
|
|
1. Document the specific recommendation ID and title
|
|
2. State the business justification for the exception
|
|
3. Define the compensating control that addresses the residual risk
|
|
4. Set a review date (quarterly) to reassess the exception
|
|
5. Obtain sign-off from the information security officer
|
|
|
|
Example exception:
|
|
```
|
|
Recommendation: 2.3.7.3 - Interactive logon: Machine inactivity limit: 900 seconds
|
|
Exception: Kiosk systems in manufacturing floor require 1800 seconds
|
|
Compensating Control: Physical badge-access to manufacturing area, CCTV monitoring
|
|
Review Date: 2026-06-01
|
|
Approved By: CISO
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 6: Continuous Compliance Monitoring
|
|
|
|
Configure recurring CIS-CAT scans via scheduled tasks or SCCM:
|
|
```powershell
|
|
# Create scheduled task for weekly CIS-CAT assessment
|
|
$action = New-ScheduledTaskAction -Execute "C:\CIS-CAT\Assessor-CLI.bat" `
|
|
-Argument "-b benchmarks\CIS_Win11_v3.0.0-xccdf.xml -p Level1 -rd C:\CIS-Reports -nts"
|
|
$trigger = New-ScheduledTaskTrigger -Weekly -DaysOfWeek Sunday -At 2am
|
|
$principal = New-ScheduledTaskPrincipal -UserId "SYSTEM" -RunLevel Highest
|
|
Register-ScheduledTask -TaskName "CIS-Benchmark-Scan" -Action $action `
|
|
-Trigger $trigger -Principal $principal
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Feed results into SIEM for drift detection and dashboard reporting.
|
|
|
|
## Key Concepts
|
|
|
|
| Term | Definition |
|
|
|------|-----------|
|
|
| **CIS Benchmark** | Consensus-based security configuration guide developed by CIS with input from government, industry, and academia |
|
|
| **Level 1 Profile** | Practical security baseline suitable for most organizations with minimal operational impact |
|
|
| **Level 2 Profile** | Extended security baseline for high-security environments that may reduce functionality |
|
|
| **CIS-CAT** | CIS Configuration Assessment Tool that automates benchmark compliance checking |
|
|
| **Build Kit** | Pre-configured GPO templates provided by CIS that implement benchmark recommendations |
|
|
| **Scoring** | CIS recommendations are either Scored (compliance-measurable) or Not Scored (best-practice guidance) |
|
|
|
|
## Tools & Systems
|
|
|
|
- **CIS-CAT Pro Assessor**: Automated benchmark compliance scanner (requires CIS SecureSuite license)
|
|
- **Microsoft Security Compliance Toolkit (SCT)**: Microsoft's own GPO baselines (complementary to CIS)
|
|
- **Group Policy Management Console (GPMC)**: Enterprise GPO deployment and management
|
|
- **LGPO.exe**: Microsoft tool for applying GPOs to standalone (non-domain) systems
|
|
- **Nessus/Tenable**: Vulnerability scanner with CIS benchmark audit files
|
|
|
|
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
- **Applying L2 to all endpoints**: Level 2 restrictions (disabling Autoplay, restricting Remote Desktop) break workflows on standard workstations. Reserve L2 for endpoints handling sensitive data.
|
|
- **Not testing GPOs in pilot OU**: Deploy CIS GPOs to a test OU with representative hardware/software before organization-wide rollout to avoid breaking line-of-business applications.
|
|
- **Ignoring CIS benchmark version updates**: CIS benchmarks update with each Windows feature release. Running an outdated benchmark misses new security settings and generates false compliance reports.
|
|
- **Forgetting local admin accounts**: CIS benchmarks assume domain-joined endpoints. Standalone systems require LGPO.exe or Microsoft Intune for baseline enforcement.
|
|
- **No exception process**: Applying 100% of CIS recommendations is rarely feasible. Without a formal exception process, teams either ignore hardening or break applications.
|