Claude 24f816b6a3
Consolidate 22 sibling repos into layered organism structure
Place useful parts of the surrounding repos into sica-fondt by layer, per the
body model (Ada = membrane; brain/endocrine/capabilities/knowledge non-Ada):

- brain/        LLM reasoning + providers (dapr, hermes, MoMoA)
- capabilities/ REPRAG sidecars: hermes tools/skills, dapr tools, parallel
                dispatch, A51 channels, and the OSINT cluster
- knowledge/    LORAG corpus: 754 cyber-skills, agency personas, secure-coding,
                MITRE ATT&CK data
- reference/    defensive threat-reference (C3, shhbruh doc) + AdaYaml parser

License handling: AGPL sources (worldosint, advanced_evolution, mercury,
Reticulum) and GPL DeTTECT are SPEC-only clean-room/port descriptions — no
copyleft code copied. MIT/Apache/data parts copied as working trees.

Safety: shhbruh escape/persistence material and C3 covert-C2 kept as reference
only, not wired into the running organism. See CONSOLIDATION.md.

https://claude.ai/code/session_01UehUqEXXJJCsHoA4voCU5c
2026-06-10 06:53:01 +00:00

1.7 KiB

Vulnerability Exception Request Template

Exception Request Form

Vulnerability Information

  • CVE ID: CVE-YYYY-NNNNN
  • Finding ID: [Scanner reference number]
  • Affected Asset(s): [hostname/IP]
  • Severity: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
  • CVSS Score: [0.0 - 10.0]
  • Discovery Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Original SLA Deadline: [YYYY-MM-DD]

Exception Details

  • Category: [ ] Remediation Delay [ ] No Fix Available [ ] Business Critical [ ] False Positive [ ] Compensating Control
  • Requested Expiration Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Justification: [Detailed explanation of why remediation cannot be completed within SLA]

Compensating Controls

  1. Detection Control: [How will exploitation attempts be detected?]
  2. Prevention Control: [What barriers reduce exploitation likelihood?]
  3. Response Procedure: [What IR procedures are in place for this vulnerability?]
  4. Monitoring: [What ongoing monitoring ensures controls remain effective?]

Risk Assessment

  • Residual Risk Rating: [High/Medium/Low]
  • Business Impact if Exploited: [Description]
  • Likelihood of Exploitation: [High/Medium/Low]

Requestor

  • Name: [Full name]
  • Email: [email@company.com]
  • Department: [Team/Department]
  • Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]

Approval Section (For Approver Use)

Decision

  • Approved - Exception granted with conditions below
  • Rejected - See rejection reason below
  • More Information Required - See notes below

Conditions (if approved)

  • [List any additional conditions]

Reviewer Notes

  • [Notes from security review]

Approver

  • Name: [Full name]
  • Title: [Job title]
  • Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
  • Signature: [Digital signature or email confirmation reference]