mirror of
https://github.com/SHOGGOTH-SECTOR/sica-fondt.git
synced 2026-07-31 16:16:26 +00:00
Update M3b-sociological-sims.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
693c7d4faf
commit
a0e99da9e2
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ solvers C3). Crypto pump-and-dump ABM C3 (3-agent protocol validated on historic
|
||||
Pop behavioral models C1.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Language & location
|
||||
TBD · `src/economy/sims/sociological/`. **Prolog** — game-theoretic equilibria, replicator
|
||||
ECLiPSe Prolog · `src/economy/sims/sociological/`. **Prolog** — game-theoretic equilibria, replicator
|
||||
dynamics, and strategy evolution are naturally expressed as logical relations over population
|
||||
states; Nash equilibrium search is constraint satisfaction. Needs efficient population iteration,
|
||||
strategy mutation, PDE solvers for MFG (HJB + Fokker-Planck), and bandit algorithms
|
||||
@ -81,12 +81,12 @@ strategy mutation, PDE solvers for MFG (HJB + Fokker-Planck), and bandit algorit
|
||||
- M3 Sims hub — lifecycle management; *stub:* manual init.
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Invariants / laws
|
||||
- **L1 (C5):** pops are **archetypes, not individuals** — no attempt to model or track real
|
||||
market participants. The sim models emergent behavior from strategy populations.
|
||||
- **L1 (C5):** pops are **archetypal individuals, not literao living persons** — no attempt to model or track real
|
||||
market participants. The sim models emergent behavior from abstracted populations.
|
||||
- **L2 (C5):** strategies **evolve** — the population distribution shifts over time via
|
||||
replicator dynamics. No fixed strategy ratios.
|
||||
- **L3 (C4):** bounded rationality is the **default** — pops satisfice with heuristics, not
|
||||
optimize with perfect information. Rational-agent models are a special case, not the baseline.
|
||||
- **L3 (C4):** rationality is ***NOT*** the **default** — pops satisfice with heuristics, not
|
||||
optimize with perfect information. Rational-agent models are an **abnormal** case, not the baseline.
|
||||
- **L4 (C4):** **complex contagion requires multiple exposures** — adoption is non-linear in
|
||||
neighbor count, not simple diffusion. Single-exposure models undercount threshold effects.
|
||||
- **L5 (C4):** the MFG limit is **valid only for large populations** — below ~100 pops, use
|
||||
@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ strategy mutation, PDE solvers for MFG (HJB + Fokker-Planck), and bandit algorit
|
||||
promote → distribute → collapse) has distinct statistical signatures in volume and price.
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Build steps
|
||||
1. Define pop archetypes and their heuristic strategies.
|
||||
0. Get ECLiPSe tool chain installed and operational.
|
||||
1. Define pop archetypes and their various strategies.
|
||||
2. Implement replicator dynamics (strategy evolution over generations).
|
||||
3. Implement Hegselmann-Krause bounded confidence opinion model.
|
||||
4. Implement complex contagion with heterogeneous thresholds.
|
||||
@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ strategy mutation, PDE solvers for MFG (HJB + Fokker-Planck), and bandit algorit
|
||||
6. Implement MFG solver (HJB + Fokker-Planck with Newton iteration).
|
||||
7. Implement pump-and-dump 3-type ABM (Normal, MA, MP) with 4-phase protocol.
|
||||
8. Wire M2 news/price data → calibration of pop parameters.
|
||||
9. Implement multi-horizon `BoundedPrediction` output.
|
||||
9. Implement multi-horizon `BoundedPrediction` outputs.
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Tests
|
||||
Evolution: dominant strategy shifts when payoff landscape changes. Cascade: sentiment shock
|
||||
@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ include upper/lower.
|
||||
## 10. Open items
|
||||
- Pop archetype catalog (which behavioral types? how many?).
|
||||
- Network topology for sentiment contagion (small-world? scale-free?).
|
||||
- Calibration from real market data — how to infer pop distribution from observable price action.
|
||||
- MFG tensor-train rank $r$ (accuracy vs. compute tradeoff).
|
||||
- Hegselmann-Krause confidence bound $d$ — fixed or adaptive?
|
||||
- Cross-sim interaction: do sociological predictions feed into M3c (AMM) or M3d (MEV)?
|
||||
- Calibration from real market data — how to infer pop distribution from observable price action. >>>We actually use blogs, reddit, and social networks to infer pops<<<
|
||||
- MFG tensor-train rank $r$ (>>>accuracy<<< vs. compute tradeoff).
|
||||
- Hegselmann-Krause confidence bound $d$ — fixed or >>>adaptive<<<?
|
||||
- Cross-sim interaction: do sociological predictions feed into M3c (AMM) or M3d (MEV)? [conditional on prediction accuracy over time]
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user