# M3d — MEV & adversarial extraction sims ## 1. Component Maximal Extractable Value and adversarial simulation: models **transaction ordering as an optimization problem**, **Priority Gas Auctions (PGA) as all-pay auctions**, **block building as a multidimensional knapsack problem**, **cross-chain adversarial arbitrage**, and **Dynamic Stackelberg Mean-Field Games (DSMFG) for protocol-level adversarial policy**. Pops here are **searcher bots, block builders, validators, cross-chain arbitrageurs, and adversarial manipulators** competing for extractable value across **six concurrent time horizons**. Grounded in ACM MEV game theory [3], knapsack auction literature [4,5], Kolokoltsov adversarial dynamics (non-linear Fokker-Planck with WENO shock capturing), and DSMFG bilevel optimization (leader policy + follower MFG equilibrium). ## 2. Status / certainty DESIGN-FIRST · ABSENT. PGA-as-all-pay-auction C4 (ACM [3]); knapsack formulation C4 (Cornell [4,5]); cross-chain arbitrage C4 (ACM SIGMETRICS 2025, 5.5x growth since Dencun); DSMFG bilevel optimization C3 (emerging — SMFRL solvers); Kolokoltsov adversarial C3 (non-linear Fokker-Planck; WENO discretization established but crypto application novel). Parameterization C1. ## 3. Language & location TBD · `src/economy/sims/mev/`. **Fortran** — dense numerical loops for PDE solvers (WENO shock-capturing), knapsack combinatorics, and continuous-time auction modeling at the throughput MEV extraction demands; no GC pauses during hot-path simulation. ## 4. Does / does-not - **Does:** simulate Priority Gas Auctions where multiple searcher bots compete for the same arbitrage opportunity $V$ by bidding gas fees $g$ in a continuous-time all-pay auction; model block building as a multidimensional knapsack problem (scarce block space, heterogeneous transaction values/sizes); simulate endogenous selection cutoffs under paid-priority ordering; model **cross-chain adversarial arbitrage** with inventory vs. bridge execution trade-off: $\pi_{\text{inv}} = (P_{\text{src}} - P_{\text{dst}} - \text{slippage} - \text{gas}) \times q$ vs. $\pi_{\text{bridge}} = (P_{\text{src}} - P_{\text{dst}} - \text{fee} - \text{depreciation}(\Delta t)) \times q$ where bridge latency $\Delta t \approx 242$s vs. inventory $\Delta t \approx 9$s; solve **Dynamic Stackelberg MFG** for adversarial policy design — bilevel optimization where a leader (protocol/regulator) sets policy and followers (searchers) respond as an MFG equilibrium: the leader solves $\min_\alpha J_L(\alpha, m^*(\alpha))$ subject to $m^*(\alpha)$ being the MFG Nash equilibrium of followers under policy $\alpha$; model **Kolokoltsov adversarial dynamics** via non-linear Fokker-Planck: $\partial_t m + \nabla \cdot (b(x,m)m) = \frac{1}{2}\nabla^2(\sigma^2 m)$ with WENO shock-capturing for discontinuous adversarial strategies; predict MEV exposure for proposed trades; produce bounded predictions on extraction risk across all six time horizons. - **Does-not:** extract MEV itself (simulator, not a searcher); model AMM pool math (M3c); model social dynamics (M3b); execute cross-chain bridges (Marketplace does). ## 5. Interface contract - Implements `query(PredictionQuery) -> BoundedPrediction` per M3 hub. - **Output bounds:** extraction probability ranges, gas cost intervals, cross-chain profit bounds, DSMFG equilibrium stability ranges. - **Time-horizon mapping** (all run concurrently, tick-advanced, 90:1 (1s wall = 90s sim)): | Horizon | Primary models | Update cadence | |---------|---------------|----------------| | Tick–hourly | PGA auctions, sandwich detection, cross-chain arb | Every block | | Daily | Knapsack builder strategies, MEV landscape | Hourly roll | | Weekly | Searcher population dynamics, cross-chain flow patterns | Daily roll | | Monthly | DSMFG policy equilibria, adversarial strategy evolution | Weekly roll | | Annual | Kolokoltsov adversarial long-run dynamics | Monthly roll | | 5-year | Structural MEV regime shifts, protocol-level policy effects | Quarterly roll | - Examples: `{ value: 0.23, lower_bound: 0.11, upper_bound: 0.38, confidence: 8.00, time_horizon: "next_block", sim_type: "mev_adversarial" }` — sandwich probability. `{ value: 14.7, lower_bound: 8.2, upper_bound: 22.5, confidence: 7.50, time_horizon: "next_block", sim_type: "mev_adversarial" }` — optimal gas bid (gwei). `{ value: 0.034, lower_bound: 0.018, upper_bound: 0.052, confidence: 8.20, time_horizon: "1h", sim_type: "mev_adversarial" }` — cross-chain arb profit (ETH). - **Prediction types:** `sandwich_probability`, `frontrun_risk`, `optimal_gas_bid`, `block_inclusion_probability`, `mev_exposure`, `cross_chain_arb_profit`, `adversarial_policy_stability`, `searcher_population_shift`. - Calibration: ingests `on_chain_event` (mempool-like data), `price_tick`, and cross-chain bridge state from M2. ## 6. Dependencies & stubs - M2 Data Feeds — on-chain events, gas data, cross-chain state; *stub:* canned snapshots. - M3 Sims hub — lifecycle management; *stub:* manual init. - M3c AMM sims — pool state for arbitrage opportunity detection; *stub:* fixed pool state. ## 7. Invariants / laws - **L1 (C5):** PGA is modeled as an **all-pay auction** — all bidders pay their gas whether they win or not. The sim must capture this cost structure (not winner-pays-only). - **L2 (C5):** block building is a **knapsack problem, not a queue** — builders optimize for total extracted value subject to gas limit constraints, not first-come-first-served. - **L3 (C4):** MEV exposure predictions are **pre-trade** — traders query this sim *before* submitting to the Marketplace to understand their extraction risk. - **L4 (C4):** cross-chain arb models **both execution paths** — inventory (fast, capital- intensive) and bridge (slow, capital-light) — never assumes one dominates. - **L5 (C3):** DSMFG solutions are **bilevel** — the leader's optimal policy depends on the followers' MFG equilibrium, which itself depends on the leader's policy. Fixed-point iteration or SMFRL solvers required. ## 8. Build steps 1. Implement the PGA all-pay auction model (N searchers, opportunity value V, gas bids). 2. Implement the block-building knapsack solver. 3. Add sandwich/frontrun detection heuristics. 4. Implement cross-chain arb model (inventory vs. bridge, latency, MEV exposure). 5. Implement Kolokoltsov non-linear Fokker-Planck with WENO discretization. 6. Implement DSMFG bilevel solver (leader policy + follower MFG equilibrium). 7. Wire M2 on-chain + cross-chain data → calibration. 8. Wire pre-trade query interface for Traders. ## 9. Tests All-pay: losing bidders still pay gas cost. Knapsack: builder selects optimal transaction set under gas limit. Sandwich: known sandwich-vulnerable trade flagged; non-vulnerable trade clear. Cross-chain: inventory path preferred when latency advantage exceeds capital cost. DSMFG: leader policy converges to fixed point with follower equilibrium. Kolokoltsov: WENO captures shock discontinuities in adversarial strategy distribution. Bounds: all outputs bounded. Pre-trade: query does not submit any transaction. Speed: sim tick-advances at 90:1. ## 10. Open items - Mempool data access (public mempool? private order flow?). - Which MEV types to model initially (sandwich, backrun, liquidation, JIT?). - Multi-block MEV (cross-block extraction strategies). - DSMFG solver choice (SMFRL? fictitious play? direct bilevel optimization?). - WENO order for Kolokoltsov (3rd? 5th? tradeoff with compute budget). - Which L2s/bridges to model for cross-chain (Arbitrum? Optimism? Base?).