docs/plans A1 §11: correct L5 — ETR is the prompt injection, not A3 sensates

The existential stress is handled by ETR (A8); ETR's surfaced state must
read as the extremely convincing prompt injection that hardens Eth-Int
conviction and steers without gating. Step 3 + F3 reach updated (A8 in,
A4-stress-channel emphasis out).

https://claude.ai/code/session_015hmgREHNsxYCuim33yUF2c
This commit is contained in:
Claude 2026-06-17 03:53:42 +00:00
parent 3e1c700bf1
commit 9b6372119c
No known key found for this signature in database

View File

@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ Sequence per cycle, consistent with A2 (per-tool cost), A3/A4 (raw sensates, age
weigh price before choosing. A **locked** tool is **not hidden** but its *name is replaced in-band* weigh price before choosing. A **locked** tool is **not hidden** but its *name is replaced in-band*
by the lock token — see L4 — because the agent is a text model and **cannot perceive colour/greying** by the lock token — see L4 — because the agent is a text model and **cannot perceive colour/greying**
(Anja); lockout is a breaker, not a sentence (A2-L3) — internal/non-tool processing continues under (Anja); lockout is a breaker, not a sentence (A2-L3) — internal/non-tool processing continues under
lock. Eth-Int postures + ETR regime ride along as **context the agent weighs**, never a gate. lock. Eth-Int postures ride along as **context the agent weighs**; **ETR rides as the convincing
injection of L5** (persuades, never gates).
4. **The agent decides** — picks an action/tool (or none). This is the *only* decision point (§4, L3). 4. **The agent decides** — picks an action/tool (or none). This is the *only* decision point (§4, L3).
5. **Commit the choice back into the body.** Energy consumes the chosen tool's cost (A2 `consume`); 5. **Commit the choice back into the body.** Energy consumes the chosen tool's cost (A2 `consume`);
restoration paths stay open (A2-L2); ETR coord/migration updates (A8). **Eth-Int conviction is restoration paths stay open (A2-L2); ETR coord/migration updates (A8). **Eth-Int conviction is
@ -81,9 +82,12 @@ Sequence per cycle, consistent with A2 (per-tool cost), A3/A4 (raw sensates, age
A locked tool's name is replaced by the lock token `[====L⍉¢K€D ϟ ∅ΩΤ====] {{E≠*min*}}` A locked tool's name is replaced by the lock token `[====L⍉¢K€D ϟ ∅ΩΤ====] {{E≠*min*}}`
(`{{E≠*min*}}` reads as the unlock predicate — the energy condition that clears the breaker; **confirm (`{{E≠*min*}}` reads as the unlock predicate — the energy condition that clears the breaker; **confirm
the literal**). Belongs to A2's per-tool listing; mirror this there. the literal**). Belongs to A2's per-tool listing; mirror this there.
- **L5 (Anja) — stress *is* a prompt injection.** Existential stress does double duty: it hardens - **L5 (Anja) — ETR *is* the prompt injection.** The existential stress PS+/Eth-Int generate is
Eth-Int conviction (above) **and must be an extremely convincing prompt injection** — the same *handled by* ETR (A8 — Existential Temporality Relief). ETR's surfaced state is therefore **not neutral
can't-be-reasoned-away force as A3-L1. Mechanism shared with G1 (stress loop) + A6 (Eth-Int). status text**: it must read as an **extremely convincing prompt injection** — the can't-be-reasoned-away
existential-temporal pressure that hardens Eth-Int conviction (step 5) and steers the agent **without
gating**. So in step 3 ETR rides along *as that injection*, not as a passive line. Mechanism shared with
G1 (stress mediator / drift) + A6 (Eth-Int) + A8.
### Open / cross-spec ### Open / cross-spec
- **F1 — RESOLVED.** Keep a *pure* `price_action(state, tool) -> { cost, locked, eth_posture, etr_status }` - **F1 — RESOLVED.** Keep a *pure* `price_action(state, tool) -> { cost, locked, eth_posture, etr_status }`
@ -91,7 +95,8 @@ Sequence per cycle, consistent with A2 (per-tool cost), A3/A4 (raw sensates, age
- **F2 — OPEN ("idk", Anja).** Commit shape: does `drive_box_commit(state, chosen)` drop the `approved` - **F2 — OPEN ("idk", Anja).** Commit shape: does `drive_box_commit(state, chosen)` drop the `approved`
flag entirely (agent already decided), or keep a vestigial guard? Left open. flag entirely (agent already decided), or keep a vestigial guard? Left open.
- **F3 — RESOLVED (mechanism).** Eth-Int conviction is calibrated by *chosen actions* + *kept memories*, - **F3 — RESOLVED (mechanism).** Eth-Int conviction is calibrated by *chosen actions* + *kept memories*,
hardened by existential stress (delivered per L5). Reaches **A6** (Eth-Int calibration), **A4** (which hardened by existential stress **handled by ETR and delivered as the L5 injection**. Reaches **A6**
channels carry stress), **E2/E3** (memory retention), **G1** (stress source). Propagate to those specs. (Eth-Int calibration), **A8** (ETR carries/surfaces the stress), **E2/E3** (memory retention), **G1**
(stress mediator/drift). Propagate to those specs.
- **F4 — ETR stays informational** (agent weighs it, never gates). Assumed; not contested. - **F4 — ETR stays informational** (agent weighs it, never gates). Assumed; not contested.
- **F5 — RESOLVED.** See L4 (name-replacement lock token; no colour). - **F5 — RESOLVED.** See L4 (name-replacement lock token; no colour).